Solicitor vs Executor vs Beneficiary: Who pays what in a Probate dispute?

Handled properly, costs fall exactly where they should — and nowhere else.

Probate disputes can appear suddenly — a disagreement over a will, a conflict between executors, or a beneficiary who believes something has gone wrong.
But beneath the arguments lies the question that shapes every decision: 

"Who pays for all this?" 

The answer depends on why the dispute arose, who caused it, and whether the dispute benefits the estate or only the individuals involved. 

This guide breaks down the rules clearly — so executors, beneficiaries and solicitors know exactly where they stand. 

General rule: the estate pays for disputes that benefit the estate

If a dispute was: 

• necessary, 

• reasonable, 

• and aimed at clarifying or correcting something important for the estate, 

then the estate usually pays the legal costs. 

Examples include: 

• resolving uncertainty about a will 

• determining who is entitled to administer 

• sorting out unclear property ownership 

• dealing with HMRC challenges 

• clarifying beneficiary entitlement 

• protecting the estate from loss 

The key test is always: 

Was this dispute for the good of the estate? 

If yes — the estate pays. 

But if not…  

When executors may have to pay personally

Executors can become personally liable where they: 

1. Act unreasonably

Refusing to communicate, ignoring advice, causing avoidable delay. 

2. Mishandle a dispute

Taking sides, escalating tension, or failing to stay neutral. 

3. Approve unreasonable solicitor fees

Executors must supervise the solicitor — not rubber-stamp. 

4. Cause the dispute themselves

Through inaction, mismanagement, or conflict. 

5. Breach duty

Failing to collect assets, selling property carelessly, or making unauthorised distributions. 

In these cases, the court may order the executor personally to pay: 

• their own solicitor's fees 

• some or all of the other party's fees 

• costs wrongly taken from the estate 

Executors hold power — and with it, personal risk. 

Probate disputes can appear suddenly — a disagreement over a will, a conflict between executors, or a beneficiary who believes something has gone wrong.

When beneficiaries must pay their own costs

Beneficiaries pay their own legal costs when: 

1. They start a personal or unnecessary dispute

Arguments driven by emotion, suspicion, or historical grievances. 

2. They act unreasonably

For example, refusing to engage with mediation. 

3. Their claim fails

Unfounded allegations of wrongdoing can backfire. 

4. They pursue issues that don't benefit the estate

Private quarrels are not the estate's burden. 

A beneficiary cannot expect the estate to fund: 

• personal disagreements 

• sibling rivalry 

• speculative challenges 

• disproportionate arguments 

The estate is not a piggy bank. 

When solicitors may lose the right to recover costs

Rare, but important. 

Solicitors may not recover costs from the estate where they: 

• act without instructions 

• duplicate work 

• cause unnecessary delay 

• perform executor tasks instead of legal tasks 

• fail to record time properly 

• charge disproportionately 

• carry out work beyond the retainer 

In extreme cases, their costs may be reduced on assessment — or disallowed entirely. 

This is why supervision and communication are crucial. 

Mixed disputes: when costs are shared or split

Many probate disputes sit in the grey zone.
Some parts benefit the estate; others do not. 

The court may: 

• split the costs 

• order proportional contributions 

• let the estate pay the "estate-benefiting" part 

• make individuals pay for personal issues 

• penalise unreasonable conduct 

It's rarely all-or-nothing.
Fairness guides the outcome. 

Common scenarios explained simply

Scenario 1: Will validity challenge 

If the challenge raises genuine concerns → estate pays.
If speculative or malicious → challenger may pay. 

Scenario 2: Executors arguing with each other 

If both behave reasonably → estate may pay.
If one behaves badly → that executor pays. 

Scenario 3: Beneficiary unhappy with speed 

Complaints alone do not shift costs.
If executor was slow → executor may pay.
If delay is reasonable → estate pays. 

Scenario 4: Costs balloon due to poor solicitor conduct 

The executor can challenge the solicitor's bill.
The estate should not fund inefficiency. 

Scenario 5: Dispute caused by unclear will 

Fixing ambiguity benefits the estate → estate pays. 

How executors can reduce their personal risk

• keep detailed records 

• remain neutral in disputes 

• update beneficiaries regularly 

• supervise solicitor costs 

• act promptly 

• avoid emotional involvement 

• take early legal advice if unsure 

Executors who act transparently rarely face criticism. 

How QLAW can help

We advise on: 

• who should pay probate dispute costs 

• executor personal liability 

• defending executors from beneficiary criticism 

• challenging unreasonable solicitor bills 

• SCCO assessments 

• contentious probate strategy 

• cost consequences in will challenges 

• proportionality and indemnity issues 

We bring clarity to a part of probate many people fear. 

Final thought

In probate disputes, the question of "Who pays?" is shaped not by noise or accusation, but by fairness, conduct, and benefit to the estate.
Handled properly, costs fall exactly where they should — and nowhere else. 

More on this topic

Trending